Food Science and Technology

ISSN-print: 2073-8684
ISSN-online: 2409-7004
ISO: 26324:2012
Archives

THE ROLE OF MICROBIOTA AND THE TECHNOLOGICAL BASIS OF MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND ANIMAL FEEDS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

B. Iegorov
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-0315
A. Iegorova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3122-7692
A. Makarynska
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1879-8455
M. Kashkano
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-9182
F. Marchenkov
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1374-2204

Abstract

The microbiota of food products and animal feed not only ensures the safety of these products, but also significantly impacts the health and longevity of people who consume them. In animals, it influences their health, productivity, the quality of livestock products, and the profitability of the agribusiness. Therefore, during the production, transportation, and storage of feed ingredients and animal feeds, it is critically important to control quality indicators, especially microbiological safety, and to adhere to hygienic conditions at all stages of production, transportation, storage, and subsequent use of feeds. A key role in ensuring the satisfactory health of humans and animals is played by the microbiota, which populates specific areas of the digestive tract and forms the microbiome. Today, many scientists view the microbiome as another organ of living organisms. Recent studies show that the mass of the microbiome constitutes 0.3% of the living organism's body mass. Despite its small mass, the microbiome plays a leading role in the vital functions of living organisms. A healthy microbiota positively contributes to digestion, nutrient assimilation, immunity support, and protection from pathogens. To ensure its development and maintenance, it is essential to enrich the diet with balanced prebiotic products, which helps to maintain a diverse and stable microbiome as a foundation for robust health and the prevention of many diseases. Therefore, the further improvement of food product quality and safety, and the efficiency of animal, poultry, and fish farming, lies in implementing hygiene measures in the production of animal feeds and establishing a healthy microbiota in animals. This is because this link in the "farm-to-fork" food production chain currently has the fewest measures to prevent microbiological contamination of feed raw materials and animal feeds. During the research, 151 samples of animal feed were analyzed. The samples were collected from feed mills in various geographical and climatic zones of Ukraine. The results of the bacteriological culture on appropriate nutrient media and microscopy showed that the microbial contamination of the samples ranged from 1.5×103 to 1×105 CFU/g. No Salmonella was detected in the finished feed samples. However, the most microbiologically contaminated areas of each of the studied feed mills were identified. The receiving device for grain raw materials and oilseed meals was found to be the most contaminated, with levels ranging from 3.5×106 to 4.0×107 CFU/g. An elevated level of microbiological contamination was observed in samples from feed deposits in the equipment after thermal treatment. In samples taken from the floors of the production facilities, an increased level of contamination by microorganisms was detected (8×105 CFU/g) compared to the finished feed, where it did not exceed 1.2–1.8×104 CFU/g. This indicates the necessity of implementing a system of microbiological hygiene measures at the feed mills.

Keywords:
food products, animal feeds, microbiome, microbiological contamination, hygiene, production safety

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Iegorov, B., Iegorova, A., Makarynska, A., Kashkano, M., & Marchenkov, F. (2025). THE ROLE OF MICROBIOTA AND THE TECHNOLOGICAL BASIS OF MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND ANIMAL FEEDS. Food Science and Technology, 19(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.15673/fst.v19i2.3211
Section
Технологія і безпека продуктів харчування

References

References
1. Kumar V, Ahire JJ, Kumra TN. Advancing microbial food safety and hazard analysis through predictive mathematical modeling. The Microbe. 2024 Mar;2:100049.
2. Zadravec M, Mikuš T, Pradervand N, Ujčič Vrhovnik I. Microbiological Quality of Feed. Open Agric J. 2023;17:e187433152303130. doi:10.2174/18743315-v17-e230418-2022-66.
3. Brundtland GH. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations; 1987. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
4. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K. Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2015;71:609-20.
5. Perry BD, Robinson TP, Grace DC. Review: Animal health and sustainable global livestock systems. Animal. 2018;12(8):1699-708.
6. Urban J, Kareem KY, Matuszewski A, Bien D, Ciborowska P, Lutostański K, Michalczuk M. Enhancing broiler chicken health and performance: the impact of phytobiotics on growth, gut microbiota, antioxidants, and immunity. Phytochem Rev. 2025;24:2131-45. doi:10.1007/s11101-024-09994-0.
7. Banchhod S, Pandey S, Haryana H, Yadava KK, Maharashtra R, Koli J. Ensuring optimal fish health: effective fish health management. In: Futuristic Trends in Agriculture Engineering & Food Sciences. Vol. 3, Book 15, Part 1, Ch. 4. IIP Series; 2024. p. 49-63. e-ISBN: 978-93-5747-931-8.
8. Khan IM, Nassar N, Chang H, Khan S, Cheng M, Wang Z, Xiang X. The microbiota: a key regulator of health, productivity, and reproductive success in mammals. Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 5;15:1480811. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1480811.
9. Rychlik I. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals. 2020;10:103.
10. Baquero F, Nombela C. The microbiome as a human organ. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(4):2-4.
11. Burge MN. Fungi in biological control systems. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1988. 269 p. ISBN: 9780719019791.
12. Whipps JM, Lewis K, Cooke RC. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control. In: Burge MN, editor. Fungi in biological control systems. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1988. p. 161-87.
13. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 2016 Aug 19;14(8):e1002533. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533.
14. Al Bander Z, Nitert MD, Mousa A, Nillaweera W. The gut microbiota and its role in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16):9387.
15. Khan IM, Nassar N, Chang H, Khan S, Cheng M, Wang Z, Xiang X. The microbiota: a key regulator of health, productivity, and reproductive success in mammals. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1-27. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1480811.
16. Rychlik I. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals. 2020;10:103. doi:10.3390/ani10010103.
17. Wessels AG. Influence of the gut microbiome on feed intake of farm animals. Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 27;10(7):1305. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10071305.
18. Chen B, Li D, Leng D, Kui H, Bai X, Wang T. Gut microbiota and meat quality. Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 23;13:951726. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.951726.
19. Bilgili S. Department of Economy and Poultry, Auburn University, USA. 2005.
20. Aviagen. Broiler Management Manual Ross-308. 2009.
21. Mavromati E, Sena L, Gjeta Z, Mavromati J. Assessing the economic efficiency in some broiler farms through the European production efficiency factor (EPEF). Eur Acad Res. 2018 Dec;6(9):5354-62.
22. Haberecht S, Bajagai YS, Moore RJ, HaoVan T, Stanley D. Poultry feeds carry diverse microbial communities that influence chicken intestinal microbiota colonization and maturation. AMB Express. 2020;10:143. doi:10.1186/s13568-020-01077-5.
23. Das AK, Chowdhury NR, Nanda PK, Dandapat P, Batabyal S, Biswas S, Das PK. Role of gut microbiota modulation in health and production of pigs. Indian J Anim Hlth. 2020;59(2 Suppl):75-88. doi:10.36062/ijah.59.2SPL.2020.75-88.
24. Selby C. Improving feed quality while promoting feed safety and milling efficiency. Feed & Additive. 2023 May 5. Available from: https://www.feedandadditive.com/improving-feed-quality-while-promoting-feed-safety-and-milling-efficiency/
25. Law of Ukraine "On Feed Safety and Hygiene". 2018 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2264-19#Text
26. Jones FT, Richardson KE. Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult Sci. 2004;83(3):384-91.
27. Cox NA, Bailey JS, Thomson JE, Juven BJ. Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae found in commercial poultry feed. Poult Sci. 1983;62(11):2169-75.
28. Andreoletti O, Budka H, Buncic S, Colin P, Collins JD, Koeijer A, et al. Microbiological risk assessment in feeding stuffs for food-producing animals. EFSA J. 2008;720:1-84.
29. GMP+ International. Technical Specifications TS1.5 – Specific Feed Safety Limits. Version EN: 2024 Jan 1. p. 83. Available from: https://www.gmpplus.org/media/beyjo5es/d0c22ef7-9577-f05f-dafc-8904d9d7ea9e-en.pdf
30. Christian A, Ada O, Umunna M, Tochi N, Okezie S, Chinasa P, et al. Microbial contamination of poultry feed: effects on birds’ performance. Anim Res Int. 2023;20(1):4834-61.
31. Escobar Lobo C. Survey of feed mills around the United States for select bacterial pathogens. Auburn, AL; 2022. 109 p.