##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is a compact form of natural gas (NG) transportation. The main task of implementing the technology of production and supply of liquefied natural gas is to ensure the stable development of energy. This is most relevant for European countries. As the liquefied natural gas market expands, its supply infrastructure is evolving. New LNG liquefaction and regasification terminals are under construction. However, there are no LNG terminals in the Black Sea. NG supplies are made from Russia. To diversify supplies, Romania in Constanta and Ukraine in Odessa planned to build LNG terminals. In practice, there is little progress in this direction. Currently, there are about 120 LNG terminals on the planet in 42 countries (excluding several dozen planned or under construction). The total capacity of existing terminals exceeds 850 million tons, which is more than twice as much as global gas liquefaction capacity. The liquefied natural gas supplied is usually used as fuel. In Europe, the quality of gas consumed is regulated at the federal level, while in the United States it is determined at the local level. There is a need to standardize the quality requirements of LNG produced in factories and supplied to the consumer. This task is no less important for Ukraine. The main characteristic of gas quality is its calorific value. In continental Europe, a different classification of natural gases has been adopted: low-calorie gas (L-gas), high-calorie (H-gas) and E (intermediate grade), established by the European standard EN437. A fairly common characteristic of LNG quality is the Wobbe number. The physical meaning of this index is that at the same pressure, gases with the same Wobbe number will give the same energy flow. In order for the seller to be able to profitably sell his product, made in compliance with all conditions and existing standards, and the consumer – to get the product of appropriate quality or bring its quality to the required characteristics, it is necessary to develop general requirements for LNG, which will be recognized throughout the world
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
2. Bondarenko, V.L., D’yachenko, T.V. (2020) Utilization of LNG Exergy. Main Directions. Chemi¬cal and Petrolium Engineering, 56, 247-254. DOI: 10.1007/s10556-020-00766-z.
3. Buduschee mirovogo rynka SPG. Retrieved March 17, 2021, from http://www.cdu.ru/tek_russia/articles/3/490/
4. Mirovoy rynok szhizhennogo gaza: prosnuvshiysya gigant. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from https://www.dw.com/ru/мировой-рынок-сжиженного-газа-проснувшийся-гигант/a-47735120.
5. Kulagin, V.A., Mitrova, T.A. (2015) Gazovyi rynok Evropy: utrachennye illuzii i robkie nadezhdy. Moskva: Institut energetiki NIU VShE/INEI RAN, 86.
6. Poleschuk, G.M. (2018) SPG v Avstralii. EKO-inform, 4, 69-82. DOI: 10.30680/ESO0131-7652-2018-4-69-76.
7. Valchuk, M.E. Mirovoy rynok SPG: osobennosti formirovaniya i funktsionirovaniya. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from http://www.vectoreconomy.ru/ima-ges/publications/2018/1/worldeconomy/Valchuk.pdf.
8. Fedorova, Ye.B. (2011) Sovremennoe sostoyanie i razvitie mirovoy industrii szhizhennogo prirodnogo gaza: tekhnologii i oborudovanie. M.: RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 159.
9. LNG MAP 2014 – Gas Infrastructure Europe. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from https://www.gie.eu/ download/maps/2014/GLE_LNG_JUNE2014.pdf.
10. Shell LNG. Outlook 2020. Retrieved March 17, 2021, from https://www. shell.com/promos/overview-shell-lng-2020/_jcr_content.stream/1584588383363/7d bc91b9f9734be8019c850f005542e00cf8ae1e/shell-lng-outlook-2020-march.pdf.
11. Gas infrastructure Europe – LNG investment database. April 2015, INEI, RАN.
12. V Germanii lobbiruyut stroitelstvo SPG-terminala. Glavnyiy argument – politicheskiy. 16.02.2018. Novosti. Sobyitiya. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2018/02/16/v-germanii-lobbiryut-stroitelstvo-spg-terminala-glavnyj-argument-politicheskij-45605.html.
13. Kutuzova, M. (2019) Zarubezhnye klienty «Gazproma» naraschivayut import SPG. Neft i gaz, Prilozhenie 189, 4.
14. (2016) LNG is the crossroads identifying key drivers and questions for an industry in flux. Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions, 22.
15. Bondarenko, V.I. et al. (2005) Energetika: istoriya, nastoyaschee i buduschee. T.I: Ot ognya i vody k elektrichestvu: v 4 T. Kiev, 304.
16. Dobyicha gaza v Ukraine. Retrieved March 18, 2021, from https://zet.in.ua/statistika-2/energetika/dobycha-gaza-v-ukraine/.
17. Martsinkevich, B. Gazotransportnaya sistema Ukrainy i Evropy posle 2019 goda. Geoenergetika. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from http://geoenergetics.ru/2016/11/16/gazo-transportnaya-sistema-ukrainy-i-evropa-posle-2019-goda/.
18. Lavrenchenko, G.K. (2012) Aktualnye problemy proizvodstva i ispolzovaniya KPG i SPG. Tekhnicheskie gazy, 3, 2-10.
19. Voloshin, V.S., Mnatsakanyan, V.G., Ryazantsev, G.B. (2013) Analiticheskiy obzor razlichnykh sposobov dobychi gazovykh istochnikov energii v Ukraine. Visnyk priazovskogo derzhavnogo tekhnichnogo universitety. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky, 27, 234-240.
20. Izotov, N.I. (2014) Trebovaniya k kachestvu SPG za rubezhom. Transport na alternativnom toplive, 5 (41), 20-35.
21. Vud, D., Mohatab, S. Vzaimozamenyaemost sortov prirodnogo gaza. Rogtekh, 62-65. Retrieved March 18, 2021, from https://rogtecmagazine.com/ wp-content/uploads/2014/10/112.pdf.
22. Gnedova, L.A., Gritsenko, K.A., Lapushkin, N.A. et al. (2015) Analiz kachestva iskhodnogo syrya, primenyaemogo dlya polucheniya komprimirovannogo prirodnogo gaza. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy sbornik «Vesti gazovoy nauki», 1 (21), 98-107.
23. Kozlov, A.M., Karpov, A.B., Fedorova, E.B. et al. (2015) Opredelenie energii – vazhnyi faktor pri realizatsii prirodnogo gaza. NefteGazoKhimiya, 4, 31-34.
24. (1998) Energiewirtschaft. Einfuhrung in Energie und Politik. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783486794069.
25. Koyl, D., de la Vega, F.F., Durr, Ch. Problemy kachestva prirodnogo gaza v industrii SPG. Retrieved March 11, 2021, from http://gazanaliz.ru/articles/ PS4_7/PS4_7_Natural_gas_specification_challenges_RU.html.
26. Bramoullé, Y., Morin, P., Capelle, J.-Y. LNG quality and market flexibility challenges and solutions qualites de gnl et flexibilite de marche enjeux et perspectives. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from http://www.ivt.ntnu.no/ept/fag/tep4215/innhold/LNG%20Conferences/2004/Data/Papers-PDF/PS3-1-Bramoull%C3%A9.pdf.
27. Dobrota, Đ., Lalić, B., Komar, I. (2013) Problem of Boil-off in LNG Supply Chain. Transactions on maritime science, 02: 91, 100.
28. Leskonog, A.A., Churkin, G.Yu. (2016) Osobennosti i osnovnye problemy obespecheniya promyshlennoy bezopasnosti terminalov szhizhennogo prirodnogo gaza. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti, 12, 57-61.
29. (2015) Zakon Ukrainy «Pro rynok prirodnogo gazu». Vidomosti Verkhovnoii Rady, 27, 234.
30. Samarskiy, S. Goluboy ogonek. Ot chego zavisit kachestvo gaza, i kto ego kontroliruet. Retrieved March 18, 2021, from https://oilpoint.com.ua/goluboj-ogonek-ot-chego-zavisit-kachestvo-gaza-i-kto-ego-kontroliruet/.